Undocumented I2S ratios

[Charlie]

I'm trying to achieve as close as possible to 48KHz (or 24KHz) LRCLK rate, in 24-bit mode (MCK/LRCLK = 48), on an nRF52832. With the values defined in `nrf_i2s_mck_t` the closest I can get is 32DIV15 (44.4 KHz, -7%) or 32DIV30 (22.2 KHz, -7%). However I can get closer if I use `0x12000000` (measured at 47.44 KHz, -1%) or `0x09000000` (measured at 23.74 KHz, -1%). 

Is there any reason to prefer the values in `nrf_i2s_mck_t` over the experimentally-determined rates? The custom values seem to work with my amplifier in practice, I can't hear any obvious issues.

Additionally, are there any better values than the ones I found experimentally? I couldn't find any documentation about how the register value corresponds to a clock frequency, so I was just guessing based on `I2S_CONFIG_MCKFREQ_MCKFREQ` definitions in `nrf52_bitfields.h`.

[Håkon Alseth]

Hi,

 

The base frequency is 32 MHz, so your wanted mclk must be a integer division of this base clock.

2 ch * 24 bit * 48 kHz = 2.304 MHz.

32M / 2.304M = 13.89 (similar scenario if we look at 24 kHz sampling rate)

 

Rounding to the closest integer of 14.

32M/14 = 2.2857 MHz

 

As you have already found out:

Wrt. the register value of div14, you can look at the definition:

https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/ps_nrf52840/i2s.html?cp=4_0_0_5_10_9_13#register.CONFIG.MCKFREQ

 

div15 = 0x11000000

so If we write 0x12000000 to this register, we should get ~2.2857 MHz, which seems to be the case when I look at it with a logic analyzer:

 

Is there any reason to prefer the values in `nrf_i2s_mck_t` over the experimentally-determined rates? The custom values seem to work with my amplifier in practice, I can't hear any obvious issues.

The list was shortened to the most match the most popular settings, so it should not be an issue to use the register value that you found now. 

 

Additionally, are there any better values than the ones I found experimentally? I couldn't find any documentation about how the register value corresponds to a clock frequency, so I was just guessing based on `I2S_CONFIG_MCKFREQ_MCKFREQ` definitions in `nrf52_bitfields.h`.

No, unfortunately. The value must be an integer division of the base clock.

 

Kind regards,

Håkon