Hello all,
I am switching from a BLE project to an ANT one, and cannot find an ANT equivalent for BLE_STACK_HANDLER_SCHED_EVT_SIZE, why is this? Presumably ANT still uses the scheduler (if desired)?
Regards, Richard.
Hello all,
I am switching from a BLE project to an ANT one, and cannot find an ANT equivalent for BLE_STACK_HANDLER_SCHED_EVT_SIZE, why is this? Presumably ANT still uses the scheduler (if desired)?
Regards, Richard.
I can't see why you can't use the scheduler with ANT, we just don't have any examples using it.
However, you can find ANT_STACK_EVT_STRUCT_SIZE in components\softdevice\common\softdevice_handler\ant_stack_handler_types.h. This should be the ANT equivalent of BLE_STACK_HANDLER_SCHED_EVT_SIZE.
Edit 12.06.2015: What I said above about ANT_STACK_EVT_STRUCT_SIZE was incorrect. Sorry.
There is no ANT equivalent of BLE_STACK_HANDLER_SCHED_EVT_SIZE.
ANT_STACK_EVT_MSG_BUF_SIZE is equivalent of BLE_STACK_EVT_MSG_BUF_SIZE.
BLE_STACK_EVT_MSG_BUF_SIZE is used when sd_ble_evt_get() gets BLE events from the BLE stack.
ANT_STACK_EVT_MSG_BUF_SIZE is used when sd_ant_event_get() gets ANT events from the ANT stack.
BLE_STACK_HANDLER_SCHED_EVT_SIZE == 0 is actually correct. And if there existed a ANT_STACK_HANDLER_SCHED_EVT_SIZE it would also be 0.
The reason is that the events are not sent to the scheduler(so the size doesn't matter), only a handler is sent to the scheduler. The handler that you specify in softdevice_handler_init(). When the Application's BLE stacks event interrupt is called (SWI2_IRQHandler) the scheduler is notified. Then the scheduler can call intern_softdevice_events_execute(); where the events are fetched from the stack and handled.
Using the scheduler with ANT should be very similar to the way it is implemented in ble_app_hids_keyboard with BLE. You should be able to use the SoftDevice Handler Library with only ANT if you use the S310 example as a starting point. I know there is a problem when you remove BLE_STACK_SUPPORT_REQD from the preprocessor symbol. You will get this error: array is too large (1073741824 elements)". Please see this question.
Hope this clears things up, if not, please don't hesitate to ask. Again, sorry for the confusion.
I can't see why you can't use the scheduler with ANT, we just don't have any examples using it.
However, you can find ANT_STACK_EVT_STRUCT_SIZE in components\softdevice\common\softdevice_handler\ant_stack_handler_types.h. This should be the ANT equivalent of BLE_STACK_HANDLER_SCHED_EVT_SIZE.
Edit 12.06.2015: What I said above about ANT_STACK_EVT_STRUCT_SIZE was incorrect. Sorry.
There is no ANT equivalent of BLE_STACK_HANDLER_SCHED_EVT_SIZE.
ANT_STACK_EVT_MSG_BUF_SIZE is equivalent of BLE_STACK_EVT_MSG_BUF_SIZE.
BLE_STACK_EVT_MSG_BUF_SIZE is used when sd_ble_evt_get() gets BLE events from the BLE stack.
ANT_STACK_EVT_MSG_BUF_SIZE is used when sd_ant_event_get() gets ANT events from the ANT stack.
BLE_STACK_HANDLER_SCHED_EVT_SIZE == 0 is actually correct. And if there existed a ANT_STACK_HANDLER_SCHED_EVT_SIZE it would also be 0.
The reason is that the events are not sent to the scheduler(so the size doesn't matter), only a handler is sent to the scheduler. The handler that you specify in softdevice_handler_init(). When the Application's BLE stacks event interrupt is called (SWI2_IRQHandler) the scheduler is notified. Then the scheduler can call intern_softdevice_events_execute(); where the events are fetched from the stack and handled.
Using the scheduler with ANT should be very similar to the way it is implemented in ble_app_hids_keyboard with BLE. You should be able to use the SoftDevice Handler Library with only ANT if you use the S310 example as a starting point. I know there is a problem when you remove BLE_STACK_SUPPORT_REQD from the preprocessor symbol. You will get this error: array is too large (1073741824 elements)". Please see this question.
Hope this clears things up, if not, please don't hesitate to ask. Again, sorry for the confusion.
Thanks for that. Why is it though, that ANT_STACK_EVT_STRUCT_SIZE == sizeof(ant_evt_t), which seems sensible enough, but BLE_STACK_HANDLER_SCHED_EVT_SIZE == 0 ? Do BLE & ANT work differently here, with regards to the scheduler?
(I think it's this obvious difference in size, and different naming convention, that led me to raise this question in the first place)
I've also noticed that the macro SOFTDEVICE_HANDLER_INIT seems to be "hard-coded" for BLE use, and not ANT. It uses BLE_STACK_EVT_MSG_BUF_SIZE to determine the event buffer size, even though this == 0 when BLE is not used!
Petter, thanks for the update (12.06.2015), that sounds clearer now. I think the easiest solution for the time-being is I'm just going to avoid the scheduler altogether - I only used it in the first place because I wasn't keen on doing lots of work in interrupt handlers, but seeing as most of the examples seem to do just that anyway...!
