This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

Difficulty Tuning nRF24L01+ Matching Network

Hi there,

After prototyping a device with modules and on a breadboard, I transitioned to a custom PCB with nRF24L01+, matching network from the spec sheet, and 2.45 GHz 50-ohm chip antenna. Other components on the board include an ATMega328P, 3.3V regulator, LiPo charger, USB-micro-B connector, and a 400mAh LiPo battery glued to the back of the board. The device is to be part of a battery-powered remote sensor network.

Unfortunately, I have not been able achieve good performance with this system. Using a spectrum analyzer with cable soldered to the board, at best I can achieve -12 dBm power at the 50 ohm point of the matching network in TX mode at 2.4GHz (channel 0). At channel 127, output power is significantly worse (-24 dBm). A single E12 step in either direction for inductor L1 (8.2 nH in the reference network) reduces output power to -16 dBm.

Admittedly, my layout does not match the reference design and I am using 0805 components, including wirewound inductors. Is it possible to achieve good performance in this configuration? Should I change the value of components other than L1 to try to boost output power? Should I re-design the board to use 0603 or 0402 components and more closely match the reference design before doing anything else? Will adding a Pi network at the 50-ohm point help?

Thanks so much! Andrew

Parents
  • Hi Andrew,

    Adding a Pi network should help, and that is probably the first thing you should do to improve performance. It is also important that you tune your antenna for the use-case scenario, e.g. for a wearable application the ground plane will be different from a free-space situation, which causes different impedance for the different cases. Also make sure that your placement of the chip antenna is in accordance with the datasheet.

    Next, using 0805 components will significantly reduce the performance as these components have much larger parasitic effects than the 0603 and 0402 variants. My advice would be to change to 0402 and exactly follow the reference design.

    From your results with -12dBm at channel 0 and -24 dBm at channel 127 it seems like your matching network does not target the center of the band. If these results persist after adding a Pi network and changing your components and layout, you might want to re-calibrate your matching network towards the center frequency of the band, depending on which channels you plan to use.

    There are also some white papers and blog posts I think you might find useful, these are: General PCB design guidelines for nRF51(different chip, but the theory still applies), Tuning the nRF24xx matching network and Antenna tuning.

    If you can upload your layout that would also be helpful in addressing your problem.

  • Hi again Andrew,

    I have looked at the RF part of your layout, it looks good. I also have some suggestions for improvement. Add a keep-out area where I have marked it in this picture, this will reduce stray effects to ground.

    You must also add a Pi-network in the area just before your chip antenna.

Reply Children
No Data
Related