This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

BLE Mesh solution that collects data from 50 node devices into one terminal

     Hi,

     I'm busy evaluating an application right now, I would like to ask whether Bluetooth Mesh can be realized or other solutions can be provided.

     A terminal device, similar to a gateway, collects data from 50 separate sensor nodes in a large room, each node producing 30 bytes of effective data per second.May I ask if the Bluetooth mesh can be realized on the premise that no data can be lost? If it can be realized, do you need the relay and hop number?

Parents
  • Hi. 

    The network itself is achievable, but 30 bytes each second might be a challenge. 

    Are all the nodes in range to the terminal device? Or do you need to have relay nodes in order to reach the terminal?

    The relay nodes will relay a message at a random time delay. This is to prevent packet collisions from other nodes relaying the same message.

    Br, 
    Joakim

  • Thank you for your reply.

    It is also possible without the need for the relay node, which can reach the terminal device by default. The main requirement is to collect the real-time data of each node to the terminal.The advantage of using Bluetooth Mesh is that it can be configured on the phone.Is there something special about a mesh with no relay nodes?Or do you have a better idea?

  • Ok, thanks. 

    There shouldn't be a problem using mesh. I was just thinking that if you don't need the relay feature, and don't need the network to be scalable in size, or cover larger areas. Then Mesh isn't strictly necessary. 

    You could solve this by using a standard star network using BLE nodes. You can have beacons transmitting to the terminal, or have them all connected to the terminal. 

    Using BLE instead of Mesh will increase the throughput. You are also able to make use of BLE5 features like long range and high throughput. 

    But this is up to you to decide. Both should be achievable.

    Br, 
    Joakim

Reply
  • Ok, thanks. 

    There shouldn't be a problem using mesh. I was just thinking that if you don't need the relay feature, and don't need the network to be scalable in size, or cover larger areas. Then Mesh isn't strictly necessary. 

    You could solve this by using a standard star network using BLE nodes. You can have beacons transmitting to the terminal, or have them all connected to the terminal. 

    Using BLE instead of Mesh will increase the throughput. You are also able to make use of BLE5 features like long range and high throughput. 

    But this is up to you to decide. Both should be achievable.

    Br, 
    Joakim

Children
Related