[Please] RSSI of PCA10112 was weaker than RSSI of PC10056

[Jeffery]

Dears

Th case ID of my old question is 218372.

I were waiting for two weeks. However, nobody responded to me.

I wanted to make a BLE mesh product used NRF52840 and NRF21540. NRF21540 can extend the range to prevent

relay nodes efforts in mesh.

At your SDK connect samples. no bluetooth sample was about nrf21540_nrf52840.

At previous case, Nordic FAE told me to refer to DTM sample. But, DTM only for single direction test for radio RX nor TX, either.

So, it was easy to enable 21540 TX as testing radio TX, AND EANBLE 21540 RX as testing radio RX.

For most bluetooth application, the radio was bi-direction and controlled by your BLE controller library.

I had no idea to use API to set PA/LNA pins to BLE controller.

Best,

Jeffery

[Mttrinh]

Hi,

Not so sure why the RSSI is weaker on the PCA10112. 

At your SDK connect samples. no bluetooth sample was about nrf21540_nrf52840.

What version of the SDK are you using? Support for nRF21540 was added to our mesh samples in our latest version v1.8.0, see here.

[Jeffery]

Hi Mttrinh

At the link, it said mesh sample already supported 21540 DK. 

But, after I tried, the RSSI was even weaker than 52840 DK (w/o PA/LNA).

I have no idea how to let 21540 work for bluetooth samples.  

Would you mind provide me a workable bluetooth sample to 21540 DK for verifying the performance?

Please don't give me DTM or radio test samples. Thank for your favor.

Jeffery