Dear all,
I'm new to BLE development and have as many others encountered some challenges when trying to scan for a peripheral device using the address filter in the scanning module.
When using the UUID filter and/or name filter there's no problem to find and connect to the peripheral device.
When connected to the peripheral device a print out, in our test software, of the connected device address will be made and has the format of:
AA:BB:CC:DD:DD:EE.
As I have understood it should a BLE adress contains 6 bytes of the actual address and also 1 byte which contains the adress type (public, random etc etc.)
- This sums up to my first question, how should the input format be when adding the filter with the bt_scan_filter_add -function? (must the input data be of the type "bt_addr_le_t" ?)
If I then apply one of the working filters (naming filter for instance) and disables the ".connect_if_match" option I will be able to see a filter match by printing data in the callback function "
