• State Not Answered
  • Replies 6 replies
  • Subscribers 74 subscribers
  • Views 1219 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Attachments (0)
Nordic Case Info
  • Case ID: 315257
Options

What are the conditions that produce an MPSL ASSERT 112, 2105 ?

laurentc

Hello, anyone.

On a NRF52840DK, modified to match my target. Using nrf SDK v2.1.0.

I have bluetooth (config for firmware upgrade by BT) advertize smp, have connection and notifs seemingly working

I am having a MPSL ASSERT 112, 2105 as soon as the fw upgrade starts.

What are the conditions that produce an MPSL ASSERT 112, 2105 ?

I know that it fundamentally has to do with conflicting configurations that I am fighting with for eons now.

Could you please publish the exhaustive list of MPSL ASSERT x,y. We would gain some dev time.

Parents Reply Children
  • 0 in reply to laurentc

    Hi Laurent,

    I heard back from our MPSL team:

    Regarding the list of MPSL asserts: We don't have such a list internally, and also these assert codes can be different for each new NCS release. Also, each assert can have many different reasons so unfortunately I don't think there is convenient way to share such a list with customers, it will be basically unusable.

    Regarding the issue itself, they are asking for some clarification:

    1) Is the customer disabling interrupts in their application for some reason?
    2) Is the customer writing to flash or is he doing some other time-consuming operations?
    3) Can they share their prj.conf files to check if they have the correct settings?

    Could you expand on this, and also share your config files?

    I know that it fundamentally has to do with conflicting configurations that I am fighting with for eons now.

    Are you suspecting some kconfig options in particular?

    Thanks.

    Best regards,

    Raoul

  • 0 in reply to Raoul

    If you don't mind, I continue the discussion in our private thread that already exists about the same subject. Titled "Need to postpone inits (like SYS_INIT hidden everywhere) so that my device can do either bluetooth or radio_test or other protocols and switch."

  • 0 in reply to laurentc

    Sure, so the issue you are describing here is just a symptom of the issues in that other case? Then we can continue there.

    If not, we prefer to keep separate threads for unrelated issues.

    Best regards,

    Raoul

Related
Terms of service