What are the benefits of having an external 32 kHz crystal instead of using the internal RC oscillator?
An external 32 kHz crystal will give lower average current consumption than using the RC oscillator, at the expense of cost and board space. There are primarily 3 reasons the current consumption is lower…
Hello Team Nordic
Is there a similar power-comparison for the new nrf52-series?
An external 32 kHz crystal will give lower average current consumption than using the RC oscillator, at the expense of cost and board space. There are primarily 3 reasons the current consumption is lower:
In total, this gives 8-10 µA extra average current consumption. Depending on application, this may be enough to justify the cost and board space for a crystal.
In the reply "The RC oscillator must be calibrated every 4 seconds to be accurate enough." Accurate enough for what?
The reason I ask is the we are not currently using an external 32KHz crystal and we power down the chip externally when we are not expecting BLE activity. So the calibration you speak of can never happen. Is this OK?
The calibration is only needed as long as the chip is actually running, so the calibration will still run when needed, no matter if you power off the chip externally.
If you take a look in the nRF51822 PS, you can see that it is specified to be less that 250 ppm when calibrated every 4 seconds as long as the temperature is constant. This is within the requirements given in the Bluetooth Core Specification.