• State Verified Answer
  • +1 person also asked this people also asked this
  • Replies 11 replies
  • Subscribers 69 subscribers
  • Views 15992 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Attachments (0)
Nordic Case Info
  • Case ID: 102191
Options
This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

Regarding nRF51822 RF Performance

Nazmus Sakib

Hi All.

I am doing a BLE based project using nRF51822. My project is a Proximity Application. Where my device need to talk with an iPhone where I need around 150 Feet (Line of Sight) of Proximity Range. I used in my design nRF58122 QFAA Package and the below RF Parts:

Fractus Chip Antenna FR05-S1-N-0-102: www.fractus.com/.../DS_FR05-S1-N-0-102.pdf

Johanson Balun 2450BM14A0002: www.johansontechnology.com/.../2450bm14a0002-matched-balun-for-nordic-nrf24l01nrf24l01.html

I know Balun BAL-NRF01D3. is the best choice but I am not able to select it due to soldering difficulties.

I found the Chip Antenna FR05-S1-N-0-102 efficiency is good, 72% so I chooses it.

I checked on the nRF Antenna Design guide. Here as I used a ready made Balun so I think there is no other necessary to tune the antenna network as Balun is doing it. Please advise if I am wrong.

I found there are many nRF51822 Modules in Market with long BLE range. Like RFduino Module range I found on web search around 500 Feet (Line of Sight). So I thought my project also can get at least 150 Feet. But unfortunately I am getting only around 3 Feet ...

I used the nRF51822 Internal LDO Schematic Model. I have attached the Schematic and PCB RF trace picture.

Please advise me how to improve the range in such condition to achieve 150 Feet.

Looking forward your suggestion.

Regards.

Schematic_RF.JPG

PCB_RF.JPG

Parents
  • 0

    Hi Kristin.

    Thanks for all your feedback. I like to ask the same ques again with some more information about my next plan.

    • In my current PCB I used QFAA Package and all discrete antenna components (no Balun). After tuning I achieved around 150 feet range, which is fine for my project.

    • In my next PCB design I want to reduce the Board size hence, I chooses CEAA Package. For Antenna I'll use Balun BAL-NRF02D3. I'll add a PI Network for tuning.

    You already mentioned on your earliest message, QFAA and CEAA RF performance is same. But now I am little bit concern about Discrete components (old Board) vs BAL-NRF02D3 (new Board).

    So in my new PCB (CEAA + Balun) with proper Antenna Tuning will I get similar range performance as my old PCB (QFAA + Discrete)?

    Thanks in advance.

    Regards.

Reply
  • 0

    Hi Kristin.

    Thanks for all your feedback. I like to ask the same ques again with some more information about my next plan.

    • In my current PCB I used QFAA Package and all discrete antenna components (no Balun). After tuning I achieved around 150 feet range, which is fine for my project.

    • In my next PCB design I want to reduce the Board size hence, I chooses CEAA Package. For Antenna I'll use Balun BAL-NRF02D3. I'll add a PI Network for tuning.

    You already mentioned on your earliest message, QFAA and CEAA RF performance is same. But now I am little bit concern about Discrete components (old Board) vs BAL-NRF02D3 (new Board).

    So in my new PCB (CEAA + Balun) with proper Antenna Tuning will I get similar range performance as my old PCB (QFAA + Discrete)?

    Thanks in advance.

    Regards.

Children
No Data
Related