Infineon Optiga TrustX key derivation

[ozanoner]

Hi,
I am fiddling with this example from the SDK:
infocenter.nordicsemi.com/in...cp=5_1_4_3_1_2

In this example, there is a test regarding key derivation as:

static void uc_key_derivation(void)
{
    optiga_lib_status_t optiga_lib_status;
    uint8_t  info[100] = { 0 };
    uint16_t info_len  = 100;
    uint16_t oid               = 0xF1D0;
    uint8_t  shared_secret[64] = { 0 };

    // Check if key derivation is supported (OPTIGA Trust X after version 1.20.1048)
    optiga_lib_status = optiga_util_read_data(0xE0C2, 0, info, &info_len);
    DEMO_OPTIGA_ERROR_CHECK(optiga_lib_status);

    if (info[25] == 0x10 && info[26] == 0x48) // !!!! THIS CONDITION RETURNS TRUE
    {
        NRF_LOG_INFO("Key derivation not supported!\r\n");
        NRF_LOG_FLUSH();
        return;
    }

As I understand, it checks the fw version of the Optiga TrustX module for whether key derivation is supported or not. According to the reply of the TrustX device, the function returns with 'Key derivation not supported!' message.
The thing is that, in the datasheet (revision 2.6), it clearly says TrustX supports key derivation in the first page.

"Crypto ToolBox with ECC NIST P256, P384, SHA-256 (sign, verify, key generation, ECDH, key derivation)"

I appreciate if anybody has any experience with Optiga Trust X, and share it here. I wonder if it is possible to use key derivation with Optiga TrustX or not, if possible, then how. Product page is here

Best regards,

Vedat

[haakonsh]

Have you talked to Infineon?

[ozanoner]

Yes, contacted. The developer of the lib replied me with examples here and here. I am working on them. I believe it is about the fw version on the module but not sure yet. weird thing is that there is an inconsistency between the nrf52-v3.0 sdk example and the example from infineon about the fw version index. nrf-sdk example uses 

if (info[25] == 0x10 && info[26] == 0x48)

but infineon example is:

if ((coprocessor_uid[26] < 11) || (coprocessor_uid[27] < 18))

while debugging, I see this:

so not sure which one is true. nrf-sdk example is consistent with the reply from the module at least, but in this case it means my module doesn't support this functionality which contradicts with the datasheet of optiga trustx :( I am on it. I will share my findings here. I appreciate if you have any comment or idea.