Hi!
We're considering implementing some security measurements into our devices, and so naturally we've started to investigate CryptoCell and other Backends supported by Nordic for the nrf52840 and others.
I've ran across this blog post, comparing the performance and power consumption of the hardware accelerated CryptoCell (CC310_LIB) and the software based Micro_ECC library for a nrf52840. In short, it finds that the hardware accelerated backend is both slower, and consumes more power than the software based uECC counterpart.
I was wondering if you could confirm these findings, or refute them if you've run the experiment yourselves and found different results.
Thanks!