Nordic not reflashable suddenly

Nordic,

We've been using the nRF52832 for many years now.  We have a custom board that uses SWCLK and SWDIO to flash our NRF52.  We're getting set for production and I am working on our automated manufacturing rig.  We have a python script that flashes a nordic with a soft device, bootloader, and then application.  Some of the GPIO go to LEDs, so I can see what state the chip is in after programming.  It had been working great then I started getting this problem where the LEDs didn't show up in the right state.  I'd go to reflash the device, and then the SWD won't connect, and I could not erase the chip.  I can hit our reset button, tied to the RESET pin on the IC, and nothing happens.  Normally this button does a hard reset, where the LED goes away and (I believe) the chip loses power.  Upon release of the reset, the board should initialize into the bootloader and the LED blinks red marking as such.  But for these 'bricked' boards, the LED stays on throughout the reset button press.   These two things: not able to reset the chip, and not being able to reflash the chip, these are quite alarming.

One piece of good news is the current drawn seems to be about 1 mA like when the Nordic is in low power state.  

I've spent most all day going through devzone forums trying things, hoping to recover or at least explain my freeze-up.  

When I go back into J Flash Lite, I can no longer ERASE the chip.  Now it says

Connecting to J-Link...
Connecting to target...
ERROR: Could not connect to target.
Done.

Fine, I can try from the command utility.  I use the jlink.exe tool, and go through the regular steps to connect and then try to erase.  This also doesn't work:

J-Link>connect
Device "NRF52832_XXAA" selected.


Connecting to target via JTAG
InitTarget() start
InitTarget() end
TotalIRLen = ?, IRPrint = 0x..000000000000000000000000
InitTarget() start
InitTarget() end
TotalIRLen = ?, IRPrint = 0x..000000000000000000000000
InitTarget() start
InitTarget() end
TotalIRLen = ?, IRPrint = 0x..000000000000000000000000
InitTarget() start
InitTarget() end
TotalIRLen = ?, IRPrint = 0x..000000000000000000000000
Cannot connect to target.

Ok, now I try to use the nrfjprog tool.  For reference I look up the version as 

nrfjprog version: 10.15.1 external
JLinkARM.dll version: 7.58b

Then I do all kinds of commands to try and talk to my board.  Here are some

>nrfjprog --recover --log
ERROR: [SeggerBackend] - JLinkARM.dll reported "-1", "An unknown error.".
ERROR: [SeggerBackend] - JLinkARM.dll reported "-1", "An unknown error.".
ERROR: [SeggerBackend] - JLinkARM.dll reported "-1", "An unknown error.".
ERROR: [SeggerBackend] - JLinkARM.dll reported "-1", "An unknown error.".
ERROR: [SeggerBackend] - JLinkARM.dll reported "-1", "An unknown error.".
ERROR: [SeggerBackend] - JLinkARM.dll reported "-1", "An unknown error.".
ERROR: [SeggerBackend] - JLinkARM.dll reported "-1", "An unknown error.".
ERROR: [ nRFXX] - Device does not have an ARM debug port.
ERROR: [SeggerBackend] - JLinkARM.dll reported "-1", "An unknown error.".
ERROR: nrfjprog could not identify the target device. This may be due to an
ERROR: invalid family argument, a problem with your device, or nrfjprog may
ERROR: not yet support your device.
ERROR: Please check the family argument passed, or upgrade nrfjprog to a more
ERROR: recent version.

>nrfjprog -e
ERROR: nrfjprog could not identify the target device. This may be due to an
ERROR: invalid family argument, a problem with your device, or nrfjprog may
ERROR: not yet support your device.
ERROR: Please check the family argument passed, or upgrade nrfjprog to a more
ERROR: recent version.
NOTE: For additional output, try running again with logging enabled (--log).
NOTE: Any generated log error messages will be displayed.

>nrfjprog -d --family nrf52 --log
ERROR: Unable to connect to a debugger.
ERROR: [ nRF52] - Debug probe is not connected to an NRF52 series device.
ERROR: The --family option given with the command (or the default from
ERROR: nrfjprog.ini) does not match the device connected.

I know the segger and cables and everything are correct, I HAD been able to program this and other boards.  But during development of the python script, I've 'bricked' 5 of my boards.  I only have 2 left.  So I need to get to the bottom of this.

I don't understand how something could ever make the SWCLK SWDIO not able to erase the chip.  What am I missing, please help.

environment:  windows 10

Parents
  • hmolesworth,

    Bingo.  Somehow the external LDO was blown.  Supplying external 3V to the IC seem to restore functionality.  I don't know how we blew the LDO supply.  More exploration and details to follow.  

    I haven't yet accomplished the internal DCDC config yet.  TBD.

    THANKS for your help. 

    Darren 

  • Jonathan, hmolesworth,

    I mistyped, I have in my notes the chip draws at max 18mA.  I slipped in an extra zero.  I'll measure peak current this morning with my external supply connected by the E9 testpoint.

    Here is the external regulator, coming from about 4V of a lipo, like you said hmolesworth. 

    Another clue to the puzzle is these 5 or so boards with blown LDOs all occurred on our rebuilt Automated Test Equipment that I've been building.  It supplies the Lipo rail.  I wonder if I bumped something, or somehow disabled the a limiter on the supply to break some of the boards.  Although this failure happened to only about 1/4 of the boards in this build.  Hmm.  

    I'll update you later today as I gather more clues.  Thanks

Reply
  • Jonathan, hmolesworth,

    I mistyped, I have in my notes the chip draws at max 18mA.  I slipped in an extra zero.  I'll measure peak current this morning with my external supply connected by the E9 testpoint.

    Here is the external regulator, coming from about 4V of a lipo, like you said hmolesworth. 

    Another clue to the puzzle is these 5 or so boards with blown LDOs all occurred on our rebuilt Automated Test Equipment that I've been building.  It supplies the Lipo rail.  I wonder if I bumped something, or somehow disabled the a limiter on the supply to break some of the boards.  Although this failure happened to only about 1/4 of the boards in this build.  Hmm.  

    I'll update you later today as I gather more clues.  Thanks

Children
No Data
Related