Hi there
I have noticed a strange error message at startup of the PPK2
Hi there
I have noticed a strange error message at startup of the PPK2
Hi
Does the PPK2 start up correctly after this or not?
If not: Can you confirm that the PPK2 is connected to the USB DATA/POWER port to your computer? Please check if the USB cable is damaged or faulty by trying another USB cable and another USB port. What version of the Power Profiler app and nRF Connect for desktop app are you running, and are you using Windows, MacOS or Linux? You can also try turning on Verbose Logging so we can take a better look at your log

works perfectly...
just a big red line in the logs
Ok, thanks. This is not the case on my end, but you might not have installed the nRF Command Line Tools or a supported version of J-Link installed? If not it's recommended you make sure to download those and I think that should resolve your error message.
My log for reference:
11:11:58.813 Using nrf-device-lib-js version: 0.4.11 11:11:58.813 Using nrf-device-lib version: 0.11.8 11:11:58.814 Using nrfjprog DLL version: 10.15.4 11:11:58.814 Using JLink version: JLink_V7.58b 11:12:01.537 Validating firmware for device with s/n FA802E9AB886 11:12:01.548 Opening device with s/n FA802E9AB886 11:12:01.935 Trigger length updated to 10 ms 11:12:02.009 PPK started 11:12:02.095 PPK opened 11:12:02.106 DUT ON
Best regards,
Simon
Wee I'm not using this for a Nordic device We are using an ST part but about to change. I saw an article online which raved about the PPK2... For years now I've looked for something similar and short of spending several thousand dollars on a fluke or similar (which isn't half as good). But this is a fantastic little tool.
A++ marks for the developer.
installing the online tools changed the messages:
Simon
Hi
Glad to hear you like it, I'll forward the feedback to the development team!
The reason the Power Profiler app checks for JLink is because the PPK mark 1 needs to be connected to a DK (and the J-Link Interface MCU) to communicate with the computer. So the check is there for backwards compatibility.
Best regards,
Simon