nRF5340 clock sources

Hello !

It is not so clear default clock sources on nRF5340 app and net cores.

1.

As zephyr clock sources, SYSTICK timers are in use in both cores and timer clocking from external 32kHz XTAL oscillator.

Is this so ?

Should I specify  CONFIG_CLOCK_CONTROL_NRF_K32SRC_XTAL=y in prj.conf this line and for what core ?

2. RTCx timers is not used by default.

if I need to use those ( RTC0 on app core, RTC1 on net core), I should specify CONFIG_CLOCK_CONTROL_NRF_K32SRC_XTAL=y on both core's configuration ?

3. App core CPU clock is 128Mhz by default.

How to be sure if it clocked from XTAL oscillator ?

How to change clock to 64Mhz ?

4. Net core CPU clock is 64 Mhz by default.

How I be sure if it clocked from crystal oscillator ?

I can see clock_init() what use

clk_mgr = z_nrf_clock_control_get_onoff(CLOCK_CONTROL_NRF_SUBSYS_HF);
Should I use this code for app core as well or only on net core ?
On net core I use NRF_TIMER2 and RADIO and they need to be clocked form HF XTAL.
Regards,
Eugene

Parents
  • Hi,

    It's best to specify for each core what clock source they should run at. 

    The RTC is not a viable clock source for the Low Frequency Controller. 

    The documentation states:

    Each core has a number of low frequency clock (LFCLK) control instances. Each instance distributes one or more clocks to the core.

    The LFCLK control instance in each core distributes the 32.768 kHz PCLK32KI peripheral clock to its corresponding core. The LFCLK clock is sourced from the power and clock subsystem to each LFCLK control instance.

    In order to generate the LFCLK clock, the LFCLK controller uses the following LFCLK sources:
    32.768 kHz RC oscillator (LFRC)
    32.768 kHz crystal oscillator (LFXO)
    32.768 kHz synthesized from HFCLK (LFSYNT)

    The RTC will run off the LFCLK.

    When started, the RTC will automatically request the LFCLK source with RC oscillator if the LFCLK is not already running.

    You can check what clock source the LFCLK is running at by checking the LFCLKSTAT register.

    regards

    Jared 

  • Hi Jared !

    But what about HFLK XTAL. Should I do some enabling of it ?

    Some radio samples requiest it by _nrf_clock_control_get_onoff(CLOCK_CONTROL_NRF_SUBSYS_HF);

    other not.

    Regards,

    Eugene

  • Hi Eugene

    Hiihtaja said:
    Do you have idea if any extra clocks need to be enabled in case of DPP usage ?

    I assume you mean DPPI?

    The DPPI controller will request a high frequency clock source whenever it needs to send a signal from one peripheral to another. 

    The DPPI does not need to use external crystal for the HF clock. If the HFXO is running it will use it, otherwise it will simply use the internal RC oscillator (which starts up much quicker). 

    Are you having problems getting your DPPI channels to work?

    Best regards
    Torbjørn

  • Hi Torbjørn !

    Yes . I have problem with DPPI.

    in nRF52 I have used

    TIMERX is TIMER2

    /* Ready Event */
    NRF_PPI->CH[RADIO_READY_CH].EEP = (uint32_t)&NRF_RADIO->EVENTS_READY;
    NRF_PPI->CH[RADIO_READY_CH].TEP = (uint32_t)&NRF_TIMERX->TASKS_CAPTURE[TIMESTAMP_REG];
     
    /* Address Event */
    NRF_PPI->CH[RADIO_ADDRESS_CH].EEP = (uint32_t)&NRF_RADIO->EVENTS_ADDRESS;
    NRF_PPI->CH[RADIO_ADDRESS_CH].TEP = (uint32_t)&NRF_TIMERX->TASKS_CAPTURE[TIMESTAMP_REG];
    NRF_PPI->CHENSET = (1UL << RADIO_READY_CH) | (1UL << RADIO_ADDRESS_CH) | (1UL << RADIO_END_CH);

    /* Configure PPI for RADIO TX/RX */
    NRF_PPI->CH[RADIO_TXEN_CH].EEP = (uint32_t)&NRF_TIMERX->EVENTS_COMPARE[SCHEDULE_REG];
    NRF_PPI->CH[RADIO_TXEN_CH].TEP = (uint32_t)&NRF_RADIO->TASKS_TXEN;
    NRF_PPI->CH[RADIO_RXEN_CH].EEP = (uint32_t)&NRF_TIMERX->EVENTS_COMPARE[SCHEDULE_REG];
    NRF_PPI->CH[RADIO_RXEN_CH].TEP = (uint32_t)&NRF_RADIO->TASKS_RXEN;
    And RX/TX I have enabled when need.
    in nRF53 I have created channels and configure those and enable when need.
    nrf_radio_publish_set(NRF_RADIO, NRF_RADIO_EVENT_READY, ppi_radio_events_ready);
    nrf_timer_subscribe_set(NRF_TIMERX, NRF_TIMER_TASK_CAPTURE1, ppi_radio_events_ready);

    nrf_radio_publish_set(NRF_RADIO, NRF_RADIO_EVENT_ADDRESS, ppi_radio_events_address);
    nrf_timer_subscribe_set(NRF_TIMERX, NRF_TIMER_TASK_CAPTURE1, ppi_radio_events_address);
     

    nrf_timer_publish_set(NRF_TIMERX, NRF_TIMER_EVENT_COMPARE2, ppi_radio_tx_enable);
    nrf_radio_subscribe_set(NRF_RADIO, NRF_RADIO_TASK_TXEN, ppi_radio_tx_enable);

    nrf_timer_publish_set(NRF_TIMERX, NRF_TIMER_EVENT_COMPARE2, ppi_radio_rx_enable);
    nrf_radio_subscribe_set(NRF_RADIO, NRF_RADIO_TASK_RXEN, ppi_radio_rx_enable);
    And events are not generated. I can see  code samples when EGU in use also.
    But can I be sure if my DPPI channels configured properly and I just enable/disable those when need ?
    Or those pairs need some EGU proxy or the need to be cleaned after each event or something else.
    I think channel can pass any amount of events and I just need to clean target in time for avoid lost of next one.
    Regards,
    Eugene
  • Hi Eugene

    Do you remember to allocate and enable the DPPI channels that you are using? 

    You should allocate them first (like shown here), then configure the publish and subscribe registers, before ensuring to enable the channels you need (like shown here).

    Best regards
    Torbjørn 

  • Hi Torbjørn !

    Yes,

    I allocate and specify publish/subscribe pairs.

    After that after each disable period

    nrf_radio_task_trigger(NRF_RADIO, NRF_RADIO_TASK_DISABLE);
    I have enabled  required channels, enable RX or TX task.
    and  disable all channels after RX/TX transaction or timeout.
    So I can just enable/disable channels and clearing source of event if need.
    No need to refresh publish/subscribe pairs and clean/enable something else ?
    Looks like in my scheme only timer can cause problems if event is not generated.
    Regards,
    Eugene
  • Hi Eugene

    Once configured a PPI or DPPI channel will just operate in the background without needing any upkeep, refresh etc. 

    Even if the event register is not cleared, or you don't have interrupts enabled for certain events, they will still be available through the DPPI and trigger tasks whenever they occur. 

    If the channels don't appear to work it's typically caused by a configuration issue, by forgetting to enable the channels, or that the receiving peripheral gets the task at the wrong time (when it is not in a state to process that task for instance). 

    Is it intentional that you have two different events connected to the same capture register (CAPTURE1), and that you use the same compare register to trigger both TXEN and RXEN (COMPARE2) ?

    Best regards
    Torbjørn

Reply
  • Hi Eugene

    Once configured a PPI or DPPI channel will just operate in the background without needing any upkeep, refresh etc. 

    Even if the event register is not cleared, or you don't have interrupts enabled for certain events, they will still be available through the DPPI and trigger tasks whenever they occur. 

    If the channels don't appear to work it's typically caused by a configuration issue, by forgetting to enable the channels, or that the receiving peripheral gets the task at the wrong time (when it is not in a state to process that task for instance). 

    Is it intentional that you have two different events connected to the same capture register (CAPTURE1), and that you use the same compare register to trigger both TXEN and RXEN (COMPARE2) ?

    Best regards
    Torbjørn

Children
  • Hi Torbjørn !

    Yes TX and RX is not enabled at the same time.

    I can see difference between nRF52 and nRF53 only in case that  DPPI channel need to be allocated from pool once and used after that.

    Channels should be usable all the time.

    TX/RX need to be enabled/disabled only when mode change from TX to RX and vise versa.

    Channels publish and subscribe can be reconfigured with the same values multiple times.

    If channel enabled, it should conduct event from source to target . (  Timer's event ISR can be enabled or not )

    All DPPI operations can be done in ISR context.

    If radio disabled for a while, no need to refresh public/subscribe pairs.

    When radio disabled, all DPPI channels are also disabled.

    But something else exist what do DPPI not working as expected.

    I need to write more simple radio for be sure if all pairs works as expected.

    Regards,

    Eugene

  • Hi Torbjørn !

    I found difference.

    It is not possible to specify beforehand pairs where the same subscribe is used ( even channel is different)

    Internally it make last subscribe active only. Even channels are disabled and freed every TX loop.

    nrf_radio_publish_set(NRF_RADIO, NRF_RADIO_EVENT_READY, ppi_radio_events_ready);
    nrf_timer_subscribe_set(NRF_TIMERX, NRF_TIMER_TASK_CAPTURE1, ppi_radio_events_ready);

    nrf_radio_publish_set(NRF_RADIO, NRF_RADIO_EVENT_ADDRESS, ppi_radio_events_address);
    nrf_timer_subscribe_set(NRF_TIMERX, NRF_TIMER_TASK_CAPTURE1, ppi_radio_events_address);

    nrf_radio_publish_set(NRF_RADIO, NRF_RADIO_EVENT_END, ppi_radio_events_end);
    nrf_timer_subscribe_set(NRF_TIMERX, NRF_TIMER_TASK_CAPTURE1, ppi_radio_events_end);

     I need to to do sequentially if would like to collect all events
    nrf_radio_publish_set(NRF_RADIO, NRF_RADIO_EVENT_READY, ppi_radio_events_ready);
    nrf_timer_subscribe_set(NRF_TIMERX, NRF_TIMER_TASK_CAPTURE1, ppi_radio_events_ready);
    enable
    Get interrupt for READY
    nrf_radio_publish_set(NRF_RADIO, NRF_RADIO_EVENT_ADDRESS, ppi_radio_events_address);
    nrf_timer_subscribe_set(NRF_TIMERX, NRF_TIMER_TASK_CAPTURE1, ppi_radio_events_address);
    enable
    Get interrupt for ADDRESS
    nrf_radio_publish_set(NRF_RADIO, NRF_RADIO_EVENT_END, ppi_radio_events_end);
    nrf_timer_subscribe_set(NRF_TIMERX, NRF_TIMER_TASK_CAPTURE1, ppi_radio_events_end);
    enable
    Get interrupt for END
    In this way it works.
    Have it sense for DPPI ?
    Regards,
    Eugene
  • Hi Eugene

    I am not quite sure I understand your problem, but can you confirm that you are constantly freeing and re-allocating channels? 

    This is not really how the DPPI is meant to be used. If you have a DPPI channel that you will use repeatedly for the same purpose you should not free it after you allocate it, if you do this then it makes sense that the driver might assign you a different channel ID and that all the existing configurations will stop working. 

    Instead you should simply disable the channel when you don't need it, and enable it afterwards. 

    Best regards
    Torbjørn

  • Hi Torbjørn !

    Yes I allocate channels numbers once and after that enable/disable/refresh public and subscribe pairs ( I write exactly the same values for refresh channel).

    In my case I would like to configure 3 channels for catch 3 radio events.

    READY, ADDRESS and END. After that I enable RX/TX(+shortcuts.)

    BUT

    I can't configure channels beforehand IF  all 3 channels expected to have end task as the same Timer capture

    nrf_timer_subscribe_set(NRF_TIMERX, NRF_TIMER_TASK_CAPTURE1, channel1);

    so even own channels are allocated and events is not happens at the same time, they can't execute capture task.

    And this is make difference with nRF52 MCU ( 3 pairs configured and enabled before TX/RX start).

    For overcome this limitation I configure (refresh values ) next pair in RADIO ISR when receive previous event.

    And it works as expected.

    Looks like channel, where pairs written the last a able to capture timer.

    And it not loosk as fork case e,g one to many. It is like many to one ?

    Can it be explained some how ?

    Regards,

    Eugene

  • Hi Eugene

    I expect the difference here is down to the difference between the PPI controller in the nRF52 series and the DPPI controller in the nRF53 series. 

    With the nRF52/PPI a single PPI channel can at most connect one event to two tasks (using the FORK endpoint for the second task). 

    With the nRF53/DPPI a single DPPI channel can connect a single event to as many tasks as you want, since there is no limit on how many tasks can subscribe to the same DPPI channel. 

    In order to connect one event to three tasks with the nRF52/PPI you need to use two distinct PPI channels, whereas on the nRF53 you can get away with one. 

    Does this explain the inconsistencies you are experiencing?

    Best regards
    Torbjørn

Related