Thingy:91 Asset Tracker V2 GNSS doesn't get a fix when connecting to a specific operator

Hi,

Hope everything is fine with you!

There are three operators covering my workplace,

24007 tele2 --- PSM eDRX good ---
24008 Telenor --- PSM eDRX not supported ---
24001 telia --- PSM eDRX not supported ---

When I say `not supported`, I mean there is output `PSM parameter update: TAU: 3240, Active time: -1`.

I am working with GNSS recently, and found a strange issue,

when the thingy:91 connects to 24001, GNSS will fail to get a fix with a high possibility, around 3/4 GNSS location service fails,

but when thingy:91 connects to 24007, GNSS will always get fixes successfully.

At first, I think it could be that 24001 doesn't support PSM/eDRX, this will affect the GNSS because GNSS shares the same antenna with the LTE-M.

But then I found when thingy:91 connects to 24008, it still can get location fixes continuously and successfully.

I checked the paging time window by using `AT%XPTW?`, it is the same for both 24001 and 24008.

So my question is what is the key point to affect the GNSS function in this case for 24001 and 24008?

Any help will be much appreciated! Thanks!

BR,

Peng

Parents Reply Children
  • Hello again, our R&D team have looked at the modem traces and your case. 

    Their initial response is that the GNSS reception is not good. Could you give a more precise description of where you are testing? Are there any walls around you, or metal, etc. The GNSS receiver alone is quite sensitive, and the antenna on the Thingy:91 is shared between the LTE and GNSS, which can cause lower performance.

    If possible, could you test with an external GNSS antenna connected to J2, as shown in the hardware description of the Thingy:91.

    Before doing that, one thing to check is the LNA configuration, %XMAGPIO, which should be something like this:

    AT%XMAGPIO=1,1,1,7,1,746,803,2,698,748,2,1710,2200,3,824,894,4,880,960,5,791,849,7,1565,1586
    Note that this should automatically be configured when building a project for thingy91_nrf9160_ns
  • Hi,

    Thanks for your response!

    I attached two pictures, they are the Google 3d map of the two places.

    Place 1 is in a residential area that is a bit far away from the city center,

    Place 2 is on the top floor of an 8-floor building near the city center.

    LNA configuration is exactly the same as yours.

    AT%XMAGPIO?
    %XMAGPIO: 1,1,1,7,1,746,803,2,698,748,2,1710,2200,3,824,894,4,880,960,5,791,849,7,1565,1586
    OK

    I don't have an external GPS antenna at my side, let me see if I can find one.

    BR,

    Peng

  • Hi  ,

    Sorry for the late update. It took me some days to get an external GPS antenna.

    I am using MOLEX 206640, it works much better than without it, and it can get a GNSS fix with a very high possibility.

    In the meantime, I tested Asset Tracker v2 on the nrf9160DK board, it works perfectly, and I checked the external GPS antenna is not configured.

    # CONFIG_MODEM_ANTENNA_GNSS_EXTERNAL is not set
    CONFIG_MODEM_ANTENNA_AT_MAGPIO="AT%XMAGPIO=1,0,0,1,1,1574,1577"
    CONFIG_MODEM_ANTENNA_AT_COEX0="AT%XCOEX0=1,1,1565,1586"

    As both boards run the same firmware and application and they both share the antenna with the LTE module, I think it could be the antenna the root cause, then I compared the two boards, the nrf9160DK has an ethertronics P822601 antenna, and Thingy:91 has an NN03-310 antenna.

    So I did some wild guesses, maybe it is the NN03-310 is not very good at receiving GPS signals, sensitivity or the SNR is not so good? I am no expert on the antenna area. But do you have some test reports for those two antennas?

    Thanks!

    BR,

    Peng

  • Hi Peng, 

    Have been discussing the issue with our GNSS experts. The antenna on the nRF9160 DK is much better than the antenna on the Thingy:91, this is a know issue and is most likely due to the size. That said, the Thingy:91 should be fully usable with is NN03-310 antenna from Ignion. What version of the Thingy:91 are you using? Could  there be an issue with the board itself?

    I'm trying to find more information on the test reports.

    Kind regards,
    Øyvind

  • Sorry, a small correction on the DK. This has a dedicated GNSS antenna (A2), which means there are two antennas on the DK while only one combined on the Thingy:91

      

Related